Many People Believe that Countries Should Produce Food for The Whole Population and Import as Little Food as Possible. To What Extent Do You Agree or Disagree?
Most people think a nation should be self-sufficient in growing its crops for its entire population, thereby reducing the goods from overseas to as little as possible. However, I disagree with it for two significant reasons, and in the following few paragraphs, I will explain them.
To begin with, each crop requires an ideal climate and soil for growth; therefore, it is impossible to produce every type of consumption product in one country. For example, apples need cold weather to grow, and therefore, Eastern desert countries like the UAE, Saudi Arabia, etc., will have to import them from other apple-producing countries. There are still many fruits, vegetables, and grains that cannot be grown in deserts. Hence, relying on minimal homegrown crops would not be practical. Therefore, a country must depend on other nations for food commodities.
In addition, if imports are reduced, there would be a price hike for locally produced crops. This is because product quantities available locally would be lower, and subsequently, the price would also soar due to high demand. It would result in no profit for anyone. As a result, most countries import items to stabilize the economy.
Follow Us On IELTSFever Facebook Page For More Updates
In conclusion, it is argued by most people that a country must produce its food for the entire nation. However, I firmly believe that importing is necessary as different crops require various environmental factors to grow, and fewer imports result in a rise in the cost of commodities.
