Some believe that students should begin learning a language very early in school, while others think these subjects should be taught later. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Sample 1:- Some Believe that Students Should Begin Learning a Language
It is argued by a few people that learners must start learning a foreign language as soon as they enter school. At the same time, others believe that this subject should be taught in their later period of time. In my perspective, language acquisition at an early age is good because till children become an adult, they gain proficiency in a language as well as they can retain more words in mind than an average adult person.
According to the first school of thought, they are in favor of learning any language at a young age is better because children have a fertile mind. To elaborate, children are sharp-minded, and they have the ability to learn words quickly. They do not take more to learn the structure, function of any language. Thus they learn more quickly than their elders. For example, many children start learning French and Spanish at an early age, and after years of practice, they become experts in alien languages. It is helpful as they will not face any language barrier in their later period of life. However, I think learners learn at a very early age to overcome linguistic problems.
According to the second school of thought, they believe that young minds should learn it in the later period of life because they already have more burden of reading other subjects. To explain, students remain busy making assignments, projects, or PowerPoint presentations to get good assessments in exams. Thus they left no spare time for learning an additional language. For instance, Physics, Chemistry, Maths, or biology are tough subjects for students, and they devote maximum hours to clear all concepts. If they start learning foreign languages, they will not be able to make a balance between these two. So it is better for them to learn it later as they will be mature and can make learning easy by using a bilingual method.
To conclude, it is clear that learning a language at an early age is beneficial because children have great grasping power to remember so many words. On the other hand, learning it later helps learners to concentrate on their important subjects. Also, it helps them to learn better due to their maturity level.
Sample 2:;- Some Believe that Students Should Begin Learning a Language
Some individuals think that students educate language immediately in the academy, but others say that these subjects should be learned later. In this essay, I will discuss both sides, and then I give my own opinion in the upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, many people why think that children educate in language very early. First and foremost, at the junior level, children have the opportunity to catch knowledge quickly rather than adults. For example, children who learn English in school language become they are good speakers of English. As a result, they do not face any kind of problem in the future. Secondly, students increase their interest in any language they develop their knowledge and also improve their skills.
On the other hand, there are numerous reasons children do not learn language very early. To begin with, students are not mature to learn a language very early. Moreover, a small group of people may claim that these kinds of courses should be taught later due to more vital subjects to discuss in school, such as mathematics. Furthermore, people think that does not burden junior-level children.
In conclusion, it is clear from the above discussion that children learn a language very early. They will help in the future and improve their skills and interest in language.
Sample 3:- Some Believe that Students Should Begin Learning a Language
At the current time, it’s not sufficient to learn just the native language. There are many arguments going on, and firstly some people argue that students should start to learn a language in early school. Secondly, some people argue that it should be learned at a later stage. In this essay, I will write from both points of view and describe the reason, in my opinion, why it should be started early.
On the one hand, students have good grasp skills at an early age, and they have the ability to learn multiple things at the same time. If they get knowledge of one or more languages, then it will help them to concentrate on other subjects in the feature. As an example, After a certain level of age, they have to increase their Mathematical, Science, and physics skills based on which subject they choose, and at that time, they might be running with a lack of time to adopt new skills.
On the other hand, they have to develop their mind at the start of school days. If they feel a burden, then there is a possibility that their mind will not grow properly. For example, Many students will develop their learning capability at a later stage, so they will take lots of time to learn new languages; During this time, they will miss other activities and many more things.
In sum, Every student has a different time frame to grow their skill, but it will see everyone’s prospects, then it will be better to teach them languages in their early school days.
Pages Content
The question of when to introduce language learning in schools sparks debates regarding cognitive development and educational priorities. Advocates for early language acquisition argue that young minds are exceptionally receptive, fostering linguistic skills more effectively at an early age. Proponents of delayed language instruction, however, emphasize the importance of foundational subjects in the early years, asserting that a solid academic base takes precedence.On the one hand, early exposure to language has cognitive advantages. Young children possess remarkable language-learning abilities, absorbing new information effortlessly. Introducing languages in primary education taps into this innate aptitude, enhancing linguistic proficiency and cultural awareness. Moreover, studies suggest that bilingualism correlates with cognitive flexibility and problem-solving skills, offering cognitive benefits beyond linguistic competence.Conversely, proponents of delayed language instruction argue that the early years should prioritize foundational subjects such as mathematics and literacy. They contend that a strong foundation in these areas establishes a cognitive framework that facilitates easier language acquisition later on. Critics of early language learning also express concerns about potential cognitive overload, asserting that introducing languages too soon may hinder overall academic development.In my opinion, a balanced approach is crucial. While early language exposure can be advantageous, it should complement, not compromise, foundational education. Implementing a well-designed curriculum that integrates language learning alongside core subjects ensures a holistic educational experience. This approach harnesses the cognitive benefits of early language acquisition without neglecting the essential skills established in the early years.In conclusion, the timing of language instruction in schools is a nuanced issue with valid arguments on both sides. A comprehensive educational strategy that harmonizes early language exposure with foundational subjects is key to maximizing cognitive development and preparing students for a globally interconnected world.