Site icon IELTS Fever

Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when they visit the cultural and historical attractions in a country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when they
visit the cultural and historical attractions in a country. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?


[shc_shortcode class=”shc_mybox”]International tourism has become the backbone of many economies of the world and these
countries rely heavily on the tourist dollar. That is why some people opine that foreign
visitors should be charged more than the domestic tourists. Although these people have
their arguments for their opinions, personally, I disagree with this practice.

It is a common in many Indian tourist places to see rate tables such as the following:- Taj
Mahal, Agra: Indian Citizens Rs 20, Foreigners Rs 970; Fatehpur Sikri, Agra: Indian Citizens Rs
50, Foreigners Rs 485. The increase in prices is due to the fact that the Indian rupee is much
weaker than currencies of many European countries and other developed nations.
Therefore, such tourists can afford to pay without feeling the pinch, and the upkeep of
historical monuments is done through this money. Secondly, foreigners are accustomed to
prices being much higher in their home countries. For example, entry to the New York
Metropolitan Museum of Art is US$20 (Rs 886). In that context, the Taj – an acknowledged
wonder of the world, with centuries of tradition and some of the most striking architecture
ever created by man – is very reasonable at Rs 970.

There are many reasons to oppose the above view. Firstly, it is unfair and leads to
discrimination. Come to think of it – if an Indian visiting a foreign country has to pay similar
high rates, what would be the reaction? On the one hand we brag about ‘Atithi Devo Bhava’
( meaning that guest is like God ), and on the other hand we fleece these tourists by
charging them astronomically high rates. What impression of our country would these
tourists take home with them?

Another reason to oppose the above view is that foreign travelers may never come again
and this could deter their friends and all others who get this negative information. As it is,
the international tourists spend a lot by staying, wining, dining and traveling in the foreign
country and so it would be a big loss to that country in the long run.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, it is not good to charge foreign tourists more
than local tourist because it would be unfair and it would be a short sighted approach of
earning the tourist dollar. 

Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local

Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local

Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local

[/shc_shortcode]

 

Exit mobile version