It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Sample 1 It Is Now Possible for Scientists and Tourists to Travel to Remote Natural Environments
Nowadays, owing to the development of technology, a number of humans are reaching remote places, including the South pole, which our ancestors had yearned to reach. Although some people believe this brings disadvantages, I believe this development entails more merits than drawbacks.
On the one hand, the first drawback is that travelling to distant natural environments destroys the previous biodiversity. With the advance in tourism, incoming visitors can alter the existing nature of animals and plants. Furthermore, travel plans always have a considerable possibility of encountering disasters. Destinations are the places that have not been investigated enough due to severe natural conditions, which may result in large-scale incidents. For example, at the South pole, a great number of explorers disappeared because of unexpected weather or terrain.
On the other hand, I argue that there are more advantages than drawbacks. First of all, expeditions can broaden the potential for future research since there is no data on such places for the investigations of new findings on biodiversity and historical routes. For instance, the investigations on the volume of ice at the South Pole revealed that the pace of ice decline was a serious issue. The research result became a wake-up call to the international community. In addition, commercialising travel increases business opportunities. This inspires the local economy and gives financial security for preservation.
In conclusion, in my opinion, though travels to unreclaimed lands have hazardous effects on the environment and safety, this situation gives positive consequences through the progress in research and enlarging business opportunities.
Sample 2 It Is Now Possible for Scientists and Tourists to Travel to Remote Natural Environments
The ability to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole, presents both advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, it allows scientists and tourists to gain first-hand experience of some of the most fascinating and untouched natural landscapes on the planet. On the other hand, such travel can have negative impacts on the environment and the delicate ecosystems that exist in these areas.
One advantage of travelling to remote natural environments is the opportunity it provides for scientific research. Scientists can study flora and fauna of these regions, conduct experiments, and make observations that would not be possible in other settings. This can lead to important discoveries and a better understanding of the natural world. Furthermore, tourism can generate revenue for the local communities and promote conservation efforts in these regions.
However, there are also several disadvantages to this development. One of the biggest concerns is the potential damage to the environment caused by increased human activity. Human waste, pollution, and disturbances can all have negative impacts on the delicate ecosystems that exist in these areas. Additionally, the travel itself can contribute to climate change through the release of carbon emissions, further exacerbating the negative effects on the environment.
Moreover, tourism can also disrupt the lives of the indigenous people who live in these regions. Tourists may unwittingly disrespect the cultural traditions of these communities or bring new diseases that could be harmful to the local population. This can lead to social and cultural conflicts that may have long-lasting effects on the local communities.
In conclusion, while the ability to travel to remote natural environments can provide benefits in terms of scientific research and tourism revenue, it also has negative impacts on the environment and the local communities. The advantages and disadvantages of this development should be carefully weighed, and measures should be taken to mitigate the negative effects of increased human activity in these areas.
Follow Us on IELTSFever Twitter for more updates
Pages Content
