People Who Are Unemployed Receive a Sum of Money Each Week in The Form of A Benefit: Writing Task 2

In some countries, people who are unemployed receive a sum of money each week in the form of a benefit. While some support this, others believe that this money should not be given. Discuss both points of view and share your own point of view.


Sample 1 People Who Are Unemployed Receive a Sum of Money Each Week in The Form of A Benefit

It is irrefutable fact that unemployed individuals receive some funds as a bonus, generating a remarkable deal of heated debate. The supporters of this practice consider that it serves its purpose in an appropriate way, whereas the opposite school of thought propound that it is highly unacceptable. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I will elucidate my views from a unique perspective and my certitude in the latter stance with credible illustrations.

Scrutinizing the given assertion and elaborating further, people who are unemployed receive some sort of monetary incentive. The first and foremost reason behind this practice is for their fundamental survival. They will not have the required costs to purchase basic needs such as food and clothing. They might run out of money to pay for the education of their children and will end up in depression. Consequently, they might end their lives by committing suicide. To exemplify, most middle-aged jobless citizens worldwide suffer from depression since they cannot get recruited despite their outstanding education. Hence, the government is assisting these people by providing financial aid.

Probing ahead with the pitfalls, people are becoming more lethargic and prefer to stay unemployed for longer durations. Youngsters believe that they can happily survive with the benefits provided by the authorities. They are least concerned about applying for jobs and building up their careers. Subsequently, the unemployment rate is rocketing tremendously, which might have a tremendous impact on the economy of the country. Furthermore, it is challenging for the government to give funds to numerous dwellers. After a couple of months, they might not run out of budget to provide such monetary pleasures for multiple citizens. It is substantially complicated for unemployed individuals if the authorities abstain from issuing funds. Thus such benefits should not be given to people who do not have any kind of employment, and they must take care of themselves rather than depending on the government.

Taking everything into consideration, although it is tough for the rudimentary survival of individuals without any aid, financial support should not be given as they tend to become carefree and tremendously dependent, and the national economy may decline gradually.

Sample 2 People Who Are Unemployed Receive a Sum of Money Each Week in The Form of A Benefit

It is refutable that the unemployment ratio gradually surged over the past years, and people suffering from financial issues are part and parcel of daily life. At the same time, a segment of people thinks that individuals who are jobless and do not have any business which tries to help with some source of funding every week for their expenditures, a popular stratum of society tends to believe that this money should not be given to unemployed people. However, both arguments should be properly investigated before reaching a conclusion.

According to the first school of thought, the problem of unemployment is highlighted across the world, which an abundance of people out of work and do not have any source of earnings to manage their expenses. This issue could be overcome to some extent with possible support and trying to give money to the jobless. This leads people efficiently manage their life cycle with some funding. Put in other words, with the nominal sum of money provided to individuals, which helps to increase the survival rate that leads to boost their confidence, they get more focus on finding desirable jobs. For instance, the Indian government recently imposed a law in favour of jobless people, which provides possible funding and support to people until they enrol themselves in any kind of workplace. To add to it, in many ruler areas, people are also struggling to meet their daily necessities, so this scheme can be highly beneficial for them to maintain their living standards.

However, the opposite camp also has some good arguments against funding jobless communities, and firstly people will take the payment provided for granted. They will feel entitled to the payment and also might miss using the money. for instance, people use this money on bad products like smoking and alcohol instant of spending it on essentials. To be clear, leaving without work might take a person to maintain and lose their interest in their work; this leads people to become illiterate and depend on others for funding.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that there are a few pros and cons to providing money to the unemployed community. Therefore, youngsters need possible support to kick themselves for their goals which they are able to ignite.

Follow Us on IELTSFever Twitter for more updates 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Scroll to Top