Some Believe Education Money Should Be Spent on Better Computers While Others Think It Would Be Better Spent on Teachers

Some believe education money should be spent on better computers while others think it would be better spent on teachers. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Sample 1 Some Believe Education Money Should Be Spent on Better Computers While Others Think It Would Be Better Spent on Teachers

As human beings, knowledge make part of our development. We learn things at the first very moment after your birth. But certainly, the most important type of knowledge comes from school. Usually provided by teachers, the way of acquiring knowledge has been changing these days; thanks to technology, computers have taken the teacher’s place. From that, we can ask what method should receive more investments: teachers or computers?

Starting with the traditional way, we have the teachers. They are quite 100% responsible for the knowledge and work in many areas: schools, universities, courses, and sports. There are plenty of areas where they are required. However, some conditions can make using teachers, not 100% successful. To be able to teach, the teacher needs to have a long preparation. What can it mean to attend university or do a specific course to acquire enough qualifications? Furthermore, as human-being, teachers can be sick and needs adequate treatment. As a result, people they teach can have fewer classes, impacting their studies.

On the other side, we have computers. At the first moment, we can see them as the best teaching method. They do not need to be fed, shower, to eat. They can be ‘sick’ (have some type of technological issue) that can be quickly resolved by buying a new part or, even more, acquiring a new computer. The most necessity that a computer has is still pug in and have internet access. Having these basic things, you can use basic learning for almost everything you want. You just to be focused and 100% committed to yourself.

If we can learn anything only using a device (it does not need to be specif a computer) with internet access, the answer to the question presented in the first paragraph is quite easy to respond to, right? The answer is no. Using my experience as an example, I can say both methods have pros and cons. I had the experience of having classes both ways when I was at the university. I started the presidential course, but it needed to be changed when the pandemic was hard. As a result, I have finished my university course in online classes. On one side, being able to stay at my house and only turn on my computer and have the same class type was really good. I saved more than 2 hours that were usually spent on commuting. But, on another side, being focused is a big challenge. I cannot explain why, but the same amount of course hours on the computer felt so more tired than the same amount at the university.

In conclusion, after this smaller demonstration from my experience, I can surely give a response. Considering the pros and cons of both ways, the best method to invest in is both. We cannot leave one of them behind. Both need to receive investments. For teachers’ best condition of learning how to teach, more flexibility and more options for their qualifications. For the computers, best devices, software, and internet with good quality of connexion. By improving both, we can have more quality teaching and learning, prioritizing knowledge.

Sample 2 Some Believe Education Money Should Be Spent on Better Computers While Others Think It Would Be Better Spent on Teachers

Unfortunately, education plays a crucial role in getting experience in various fields. Although some people consider that amount of money should consume on computers instead of teachers; however, demographics think that it has numerous grave repercussions; it spends on teaching professions. I will elucidate both aspects along with my perspective in the forthcoming paragraphs.

To commence with, advanced computers have enormous benefits in the high-tech era. The predominant one is the time-saving mode, the cheapest and most convenient. To elaborate on it, individuals can use it any time, reducing transport and study inflation. It is more convenient for them as compared to conventional techniques. Moreover, they could access up-to-date knowledge related to studying at home nor only, but also mortals would independently learn study skills. For example, 70 % of learners get experience related to education from websites in the twenty-first century which proved fruitful for them. Hence, money allocated for the development of computers would lead to an independent way of learning skills and staying more focused.

To strengthen the views, teachers who teach to schoolers in alternative ways thematically and practically according to needs and weaknesses. To explain it, the human brain has the capability to teach various teaching categories while the machine does not understand as leaders feel comfort during teaching training and learning related to cooperation and tackling difficulties regarding the study. To cite an example, 8%out10% of students prefer a conventional teaching style due to better results and feeling better physically and mentally after getting expected outcomes. Therefore, teachers’ and students’ bonds will strengthen in education. Furthermore, this tendency is beneficial for health.

To conclude, although computers are more suitable for learning, experts who teach students by their own experience have many advantages that outweigh the screen. In addition, I considered that people would disburse a chunk of money to teachers who provide education with different techniques.

Follow Us on IELTSFever Twitter for more updates 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Scroll to Top