# Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most Large companies However, some people think that an interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today is an era of cutthroat competition individuals in modern epoch are engrossed in mundane affairs. Lion’s share of individuals does jobs in different bureau’s, with there. selection process interviews are conducted. Many individuals believe that Internews is not trust forthy way of selection and there are a plethora of other Techniques too. I firmly agree with the statement and I intend to highlight my views in the following paragraphs
To embark with there u no doubt the handful of masses work and right to fulfill their cozy lifestyle and high expenses while recruiting folks multinational companies continue to follow the traditional method of interviews but there are myriad of other techniques that play an important role in the selection of pro Candidates. Firstly individuals profile depicts a lot about the credentials so demonstration sessions can be conducted by the employers instead of the interview session. Secondly, many enterprises hold only written exams to judge the academic level of respective Candidates for instance in large companies. Pen and paper method is used by the enterprises
To elucidate further sometimes written test is followed by group discussions Another conventional method is commutation plays an integral role in judging the person capability as a salesman job apart from qualification spoken skills are preferred by the employer. In addition to the conversation written exam group discussion and interviews Lave the methods used by numerous companies
To recalculate I put my pen down by saying that each method has its own advantage as well as disadvantage. However, instead of depending on one particular method that is interview enterprises should adopt new innovating methods to Judge the right potential of candidates