-----------------------------SPONSERS-----------------------------

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby.

Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby.

-----------------------------ADVERTISEMENT-----------------------------

Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

introduction:
In the contemporary era, it is a moot point that smoking has detrimental effects on the smoker as well as the people living around him. A significant chunk of the community welcomes the conception, whereas the remaining members oppose the same. In this essay, I will explain this point of view in detail with the relevant examples to support my argument.
paragraph 1:
I am in agreement to a large extent with the aforementioned notion. Multifarious reasons can be discussed to justify my stance. The most conspicuous one is the smoker himself welcomes deadly diseases like cancer (mouth and lungs), kidney failure to his body. For instance, a cigarette contains killing components like tobacco, nicotine, and carbon monoxide these destroy the airbus of the lungs. As a consequence, a person’s digestive system starts to stop working. Its impacts do not appear overnight but if its consumption lasts for years a brutal death can knock at your door. Additionally, it is more harmful to passive smokers. To illustrate this, I would quote an instance of my friend who is suffering from lung cancer. However, he had never smoked in his life. He got infected just because his father is an active smoker. Having lived in the same house inhaling cigarette smoke he got affected.
paragraph 2:
On the other hand, I do have some grounds against the central idea. First and foremost rationale is it may bring some of the businesses to an end. For instance, pubs and discos are usually visited by a proportion of 80% of smokers. If it is banned completely it will wash off above mentioned businesses.
overall:
To put it in a nutshell, I personally believe that it is difficult to persuade people to quit but it must be prohibited in public places. Moreover, in clubs, there should be a separate area for smoking so passive smokers would not suffer.

this is the end of writing task 2:(Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby.Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?)

2 thoughts on “Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby”

  1. Undoubtedly, everyone will agree that smoking is injurious to health. Both active and passive smokers are affected due to the smoke of cigarettes. Hence, numerous people have an opinion to ban smoking in public areas. I am also in complete accord with this statement for myriad reasons. In the upcoming paragraphs, I shall be justifying my reasons with proper explanations and examples.

    Out of all the reasons, the foremost one is smoking is a dangerously bad habit which can cause several serious diseases like lung cancer, mouth cancer and many more. Moreover, the chemicals in tobacco damage airways of lungs, blood cells and also weaken the immune system. With the passage of time, it causes serious harm to person’s health. If smoking ban is imposed in public area, then it will improve the people’s health. Furthermore, smoking can be reduced as the smokers will have to go in private area.

    Additionally, it has been universally proved that passive smoking is more dangerous and affects the person’s health. To add to this, there should be separate places for smokers to smoke. This problem has been realised by many organisations like IT companies because they offer separate smoking areas to their employees who smoke so that other employees will not suffer. Recent surveys conducted by human health department India, shows that 80% of the smoking population tries to quit the smoking at least once in their lifetime, however, they are unable to achieve it.

    To recapitulate, it can be finally said that restriction of smoking publicly helps both the smokers as well as non-smokers. I believe that the government should implement strict laws to ban smoking publicly and run campaigns so that people will be aware of the consequences. Consecutively, it will improve well-being index of the country.

    Thanks & Regards,
    Ishika Goel

  2. Heena Kochhar

    The smoke of Cigarettes are very deleterious to all especially those who situated around smokers, thus
    practising of smoking in open places should be prohibited. I believe forbidding smoking in the public
    place can be fruitful for individuals. Firstly, this essay shall discuss how dangerous for people to perform
    such thing in an open place and secondly it will argue that impact of this practice influence negatively on
    the young generation.
    Since the introduction of cigarettes, people have a different view towards purchasing this harmful thing
    some buy to release the stress, showing royalty and few are addictives. Unfortunately for others, they
    are just victim of this process so higher authority should ban this activity in public places such as the
    theatres, malls, food chain restaurants and etcetera. An individual suffering from lung diseases due to
    breathing excessive toxic air, in the year 2014 the university of Oxford declared that five in fifty people around
    the globe face this kind of toxic challenge which resulted in lung cancer and multiple diseases. Thus,
    smoking in a public place is hazardous to one’s health and injury to others.
    In addition, the impact of such a negative environment is very unhealthy for teenage especially those who
    enrolling for tertiary and finishing their secondary education. I reckon this category of people is very
    risky to adopt such a bad habit in their lives. For instance, major consumers of cigarettes are youth
    according to the seller of a pioneer owner of cigarettes revealed in 2017. Therefore, the development of public
    smoking is not injurious to health but equally destroying our young generation.
    To conclude, the government should implement such a protective rule to abandon this activity, which
    silently killing many people.

  3. -----------------------------SPONSERSss-----------------------------

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

--------------------------------ADVERTISEMENT---------------------------